If people check the party principles and history of the Republican and Democratic Party I know most will identify themselves as Conservatives and therefore will register as Republican specially Asians.
Most Asians have Conservative values therefore they will find their values in common with the Republicans.
I am very familiar why most Filipinos and other Asians are registered Democrats. Back in the Philippines the word “Democratic” or “Democracy” is a familiar word by Filipinos because it means Freedom and Capitalism.
Another reason why they registered Democrats because when Filipinos who come over here in the US, they did not know that majority of the media is Liberal. So when we watch TV news and read newspapers all you will learn is that the Conservatives are bunch of racists, fascists and etc. The liberal media even report false news against Conservatives and they wont correct it because they know that Liberals believe anything the Mainstream media will report.
This daily news from the Left will eventually brain washed new immigrants into thinking that the Republicans or Conservatives are bad and the Liberals or Democrats is the good one. So when they become US citizens then obviously they register Democrats.
I also discovered that most Filipinos are Politically Conservatives but they don’t know it is because after I shared to them the Conservative principles and most of them admitted they share the same conservative values, and then I told them Now you know you are really a Conservative and not a Liberal.
The difference between the Liberals (Democrats) and Conservatives (Republicans)
Republican Conservative Principles:
* Anti-Abortion or Pro-Life
* Pro-Legal Immigration, Against ILLEGAL Immigration.
* Traditional family
* Believes that marriage is between a man and a woman only.
* Maintaining the core family values that helped establish our great country
* Believes in Free market economy
* Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals.
* Individual rights or liberty
* For Lower taxes, Tax cuts
* Government money does not belong to government. It belongs to the taxpayers who worked hard for it,
and who had funds deleted from their paychecks even before they got to see them.
* As it pertains to the constitution, a conservative believes in what is called “original intent.”
* Believes in personal responsibility.
* Opposes welfare or entitlement (welfare, SSI. Section 8 etc) except for those who really needs it
* Strong national defense through a strong military (Peace through Strength)
* Limited government or Smaller government for less restriction and control.
* Free enterprise (Capitalism) and limited government are the heart and soul of the Republican Party.
Democratic Party’s Liberal Principles:
Pro-Abortion
Pro Illegal Immigration.
For Taxpayer Money to Pay for Contraceptives
For Taxpayer Money to Pay for Abortions
Support Gay Marriage
Anti Military (cuts Military budget)
Don’t care about traditional family
For big Government or more Government control
For Govt Socialized Healthcare
For welfare even to those people who are able to work, but chose not to.
For all kinds of Tax Increase (they believe that it is necessary to raise taxes to feed the poor, even these people can work if they want to but chose not to and instead rely on taxpayers’ money to feed them)
I was able to enlightened them more people when I told them that the original racist party was the Democrat party,it was the Democrat party who opposed freeing the Slaves, that all KKK members were Democrats, Lincoln was a Republican who freed the slaves, those times the party of the Blacks is the Republican Party etc. Almost all Pinoy Democrats by default do not know the history. I was once one of the Democrat by default because of the Mainstream media and naive of the history, when I learned about history and the conservative principles I discovered I was a Conservative
If you search for the History of the Democratic Party you will discovered that they the one who is the racist Party.
DEMOCRATS Opposed:
Abolition of slavery in 1865
Citizenship for Blacks 1866
Voting Rights for Black 1869
The Republican Party is the one who fought to abolish slavery, citizenship for the Black people, and Voting Rights for the Black People.
Also the First Black US Senators and Congressmen were all Republicans only 3 years after the Republican Party abolished Slavery.
Rep. John Willis Menard (R) Louisiana 1868.
Rep. Joseph Rainy (R). South Carolina 1869 – 1878.
Senator Hiram R. Revels (R). Mississippi 1860 – 1870. First Black Senator in US History.
Rep. Jefferson F, Long (R). Georgia 1869 – 1870
Rep. Robert C. DeLarge (R). South Carolina 1871 – 1872
Rep. Robert B. Elliot (R). South Carolina 1871 – 1872, 1873, 1874
If you actually look up the party affiliations of all of the southern “Dixiecrats,” you can see that most never even switched sides. Al Gore, Sr.? Never switched. Robert Byrd? Never switched. Bull Connor, a.k.a. the arch-nemesis of MLK, jr.? Never switched. In fact, out of all the politicians that were “Dixiecrats,” (there were 18 in total), only two ever switched. There was never a mass exodus of southern Democrats from the Democrat Party, and there’s definite proof to back up that statement. Saying they all became Republicans is the epitome of revisionist history, and it’s a shame how many people are buying it.?
By February 1854, anti-slavery Whigs had begun meeting in the upper Midwestern states to discuss the formation of a new party. One such meeting, in Wisconsin on March 20, 1854, is generally remembered as the founding meeting of the Republican Party.
In 1856 the Republican party was founded and John Fremont became the first candidate of the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States.
Democrats called them Black Republican party because the Republican was based on the abolition movement designed to help blacks Americans and free the slaves and keep them free in the Northern Territories.
Next election in 1860 cycle Lincoln won the election and the 7 states of the Confederacy in the deep south were out of the Union before Lincoln took office because they knew that the election of a Republican President meant the end of slavery in America.
The National Union Party was the temporary name used by the Republican Party for the national ticket in the 1864 presidential election which was held during the Civil War. … The party nominated incumbent President Abraham Lincoln and for Vice President Democrat Andrew Johnson, who were elected in an electoral landslide.
The Liberal Media Bias (CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, PBS, AP, REUTERS, etc)
The liberal media will not report anything good done by Conservatives, most of the reports they make are nagatives towards Conservative and the Republican Party.
The Effect of the Liberal Media to new Asian immigrants in America.
The biggest advantage of the Democrat party is their Liberal Media who are constantly reporting bias, and half truth against Republicans. Many immigrants are being brainwashed into thinking that Conservatives and Republicans are not good and bunch of racists people which is actually the other way around if you know the history slavery and emancipation.
LAS VEGAS — Theories abound as to why Manny Pacquiao has gone seven fights since 2009 without knocking out an opponent.
The effects of age on the 35-year-old, the talent and size of the opponents, conditioning flaws and distractions in his personal life and in his public life as a congressman in the Philippines are among the most cited reasons.
Pacquiao’s opponent Saturday at the MGM Grand, World Boxing Organization welterweight champion Timothy Bradley, has called out Pacquiao (55-5-2, 38 knockouts) for losing his “killer instinct.”
“It’s reality,” Bradley (31-0) said Thursday. “His fans are saying the same thing: ‘He doesn’t have the fire,’ ‘He’s had guys pinned in the corner and lets them get away.’ That never happened before. He’s not finishing guys. Something’s changed.”
Though the tangible effects of age cannot be discounted, Pacquiao’s trainer Freddie Roach points to a mental shift as the reason. Roach surprised some this week when he publicly floated the theory that the Bible was “getting in the way” of how Pacquiao was approaching his fights.
“He has lost the killer instinct,” Roach said. “His religious outlook on life … is the major reason why he hasn’t knocked people out. I’m sure of it.”
Even his coach Roach think his change of Religion made Pacman lost his killer instinct
“He has lost the killer instinct,” Roach said. “His religious outlook on life … is the major reason why he hasn’t knocked people out. I’m sure of it.”
Bradley (31-0) said Thursday. “His fans are saying the same thing: ‘He doesn’t have the fire,’ ‘He’s had guys pinned in the corner and lets them get away.’ That never happened before. He’s not finishing guys. Something’s changed.”
When Pacman was a Catholic he used to do sign of the croess and wear Rosary Pacman get a special power a fire inside him to Knock Out Opponents
You Lost Again Pacman – Do you emember you TRASHED the statues of Saints of your Mommy Dionisia before? and you intentionally remove the rosary that made you 8 division champ. After you neglected the Rosary that gave you strength what happened to you now ?
I don’t know but for some reasons anyone who trashed or broke statues of the Saints something happens bad to that person all his life. There are a lot of evidences and countless testimonies of people they know who broke the statues of Saints then he or his family members got sick or his or lost their jobs and some even got killed. I have also observed this to my Uncle who broke and buried the statues of the Saints of my Grandma a lot of bad things happened to him until now.
UPDATE 5/6/15
At least 5 lawsuits filed against Pacquiao in US courts
Boxer Manny Pacquiao has been sued in several U.S. courts by people who said they paid to watch him fight Floyd Mayweather Jr. in the “Fight of Century” but felt defrauded by Pacquiao’s failure to disclose a pre-bout shoulder injury.
At least five lawsuits were filed against Pacquiao on Tuesday in federal courts in California, Illinois, Nevada and Texas. The lawsuits seek compensation under laws meant to protect consumers and ask for status as class actions on behalf of ticket buyers, pay-per-view television viewers and people who gambled on the fight.
The terrible revelations of sexual misbehavior and cover-ups, exposed in 2002-2003 remain a huge and unspeakably evil scandal. I’ve never seen any conscientious, serious Catholic try to excuse or justify what happened. It’s a black mark that has caused untold damage in many ways.
Yet Catholics are sinners like anyone else, and we should not be utterly shocked when we see instances that prove this: even in cases of heinous sins. King David murdered and committed adultery, yet God still entered into an eternal covenant with him. Indeed, God knew (since He knows everything) when David was a boy that he would eventually commit these terrible sins.
That said, it is also true that media coverage of the outrages and the general issues involved, has been severely distorted. Statistics clearly show that the problem of sexual abuse is a societal-wide one, with occurrences farmore prevalent in other circles. Yet the focus and spotlight continues to be basically only on the Catholic Church. It’s classic selective, cynical, agenda-driven reporting, with the result being false and distorted perceptions.
An independent study conducted by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, commissioned by the USCCB, from May 2011, found that sexual abuse from priests occurs at a much lower rate than in the rest of society, and that most abuse takes place in families. The rate among priests was determined to be five per every 100,000 young people, whereas the larger societal rate was 134, or almost a 27 times greater likelihood.
Even if we examine fellow Christians (non-Catholics), the known statistics are very sobering and revealing. For example, the “flagship” evangelical Protestant magazine Christianity Today noted that there were “70 child abuse allegations reported against American Protestant churches each week during the last ten years,” a quarter of which were against pastors. (“Go Figure” 21 May 2002). If we do the math, that adds up to 36,400 cases in ten years.
In a 1983 doctoral thesis by Richard Blackmon, entitled The Hazards of Ministry (Fuller Theological Seminary: Pasadena, California), it was revealed that 12% of the 300 Protestant clergy surveyed admitted to sexual intercourse with congregants, and 38% admitted to other sexualized contact.
A huge amount of documented material about sexual abuse in non-Catholic religious circles is easily obtainable via Google search. Accordingly, Rt. Rev. William Persell, Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Chicago, frankly and fairly admitted in his Good Friday Sermon from 2002:
“We would be naïve and dishonest were we to say this is a Roman Catholic problem and has nothing to do with us because we have married and female priests in our church. Sin and abusive behavior know no ecclesial or other boundaries.”
Leaving the religious realm, we find even moreoutrageous statistics. Thus, for example, a 2004 study, commissioned by the U.S. Dept. of Education, and entitled, “Educator Sexual Misconduct: A Synthesis of Existing Literature” (Carol Shakeshaft), soberly concluded that “the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests.”
The reporting has become so systematically distorted, that even atheists are strongly speaking out against the smearing campaign. Brendan O’Neill’s article, “Catholic-bashers have embellished the truth about abuse in Catholic institutions. It’s time to put the record straight,” in The Telegraph (14 February 2013), noted that the Irish government’s McAleese Report on the Magadalene laundries, “utterly exploded the popular view”. This myth includes the usual ridiculous exploitation of a film devoted to the supposed (grossly exaggerated) sordid goings-on. O’Neill observed:
“The idea of the “good lie”, the lie which helps open people’s eyes to the existence of wickedness, should be anathema to anyone who cares about getting history right and establishing the truth. Yet there seem to be many in Ireland who believe that telling “good lies” about the extent of abuse in Catholic institutions is an okay thing to do since it might prove cathartic for a nation allegedly in denial about its dark past. . . . When the Irish government published its Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse in 2009, newspaper headlines declared “Thousands were raped in Irish reform schools” . . . actually, the commission heard allegations of 68 rapes, . . .”
What a breath of fresh air, for an atheist to so eloquently denounce what he describes as the “fashionable and irrational new religion of anti-Catholicism.”
In the final analysis we must be aware that Satan will utilize any tactic he can to bring dishonor and shame upon the Catholic church. He loves to take real scandals (as every effective lie has some truth in it) and magnify them a hundred times, so as to cause as much damage and devastation and slander as possible. This, too, is nothing new. It’s so old that St. Augustine (354-430) took note of it in words that are strikingly relevant to and descriptive of our own times:
“[W]hat do they watch for, if it be not for this, that so soon as any bishop or clergyman or monk or nun has fallen, they may have ground for believing, and boasting, and maintaining that all are the same as the one that has fallen, . . . ? . . . the moment that any crime is either falsely allegedor actually proved againstanyonewho makes a profession of piety, these men are incessant and unwearied in their efforts to make this charge be believed against all religious men.” (Epistle 78 [6]: to the Church at Hippo, 404 A.D.; my italics)
1. Are you saved? This is what some Protestants will ask you. Anyone who thinks they are automatically “saved” simply by declaring that Jesus Christ is their personal Lord and Savior is grossly mistranslating Holy Scripture, and is committing a sin of presumption.
2. It is GOD alone who knows who is “saved” and who is not. No human creature can declare themselves as being “saved”.
3. That false doctrine is a fabrication of Protestantism and cannot be found written anywhere before the Protestant revolt.
4. Salvation is an on-going process throughout our entire lives as Holy Scripture clearly has told us. Read 1Corinthians chapter 13, as it tells us that we must have faith, hope, and charity.
5. If we are automatically “saved”, then what is the purpose of hope?
Sola Fides, or “saved by faith only” is taught by many Protestants. However, that false man-made Protestant doctrine cannot be found anywhere in the Bible.
6. In fact, the only place in the entire Bible where the words “faith” and “only” are found together is in James 2:24, where it says,”You see that by works a man is justified, and NOT by faith only.”
7. That verse was a thorn in Martin Luther’s side. He called the book of James a “straw epistle”, which meant it was worthy of burning, and he wanted to remove it from Scripture. It must have been an embarrassment to him since he had added the word “alone” to Romans 3:28, in his German translation of the Bible, in order to have it support his false “justified by faith alone” doctrine. James 2:24 is still ignored or rejected altogether by many Protestants.
8. man was not just arrogant but evil in his desire to conform the Bible to his personal, and heretical, opinions.
9. In addition Martin Luther add to the Bible words that do not exist in the Greek extant manuscripts. When Martin Luther was confronted about why he was messing with the Bible, he replied, “Because my will is good enough.” This was one arrogant person. http://www.thecatholictreasurechest.com/errprot.htm
Sinampahan ng Philippine National Police ng kasong paglabag sa Article 133 ng Revised Penal Code (RPC) o Offending Religious Feelings at paglabag sa Batasang Pambansa No. 880 o illegal assembly ang apat na katao kabilang ang tatlong babae at isang lalaki nang tangkain ng mga itong insultuhin si Pope Francis sa kanyang pagdating sa tinuluyang Apostolic Nunciature noong Enero 17.
Kabilang sa mga kinasuhan ng PNP na kinatawan ni P/Insp. Ernesto de Bien Jr., ng Candon City Police Station, Ilocos Sur at ni PO3 Johnel Domingo, ng San Fernando City Police Station sina Felix Bruce Bertos, 36; Restituta Samonte, 21; Esmeralda Cruz, 19, estudyante; at Hazal Apao, 39, missionary.
Ayon sa report, naganap ang insidente dakong alas-4:30 ng hapon malapit sa Apostolic Nunciature sa kanto ng Quirino at Taft Avenue, Maynila noong Enero 17 habang papasok na sa kanyang tinutuluyan ang Pope nang iladlad ng apat ang dala nilang tarpaulin na nagsasaad ng “Ika-2 utos, Huwag kayong sumamba, yuyukod at maglilingkod sa diyus-diyusan, larawan o rebulto ng ano mang nilalang. Exodo 20:4-5”; “Only Jesus Christ can save you from sin and hell”; at “Kamatayan ang kabayaran ng kasalanan ngunit ang kaloob ng Diyos ay buhay na walang hanggan sa pamamagitan ni Hesukristo na ating Panginoon. Roma 6:23”.
Ang ginawa umano ng apat ay nakaakit sa atensyon ng mga Katoliko at deboto na masayang nagsisigawan nang makita si Pope Francis.
Nalaman na ang apat ay miyembro ng Evangelical Christians at nang hingan kung mayroon silang permit para mag-assembly ay walang naipakita.
The Protestant “Once Saved Always Saved” ERROR
